English Section Plagiarism Procedure Policy
English Section Plagiarism Procedure Policy
The English Section, Department of Translation Studies
University of Tampere


(Version 1.2, approved by the English Section on 06 September 2001)
(Approved by Transla on 19 September 2001)

This document outlines the procedures for staff to follow if plagiarism is suspected in papers, essays, theses, or similar written work for which the identification and proper citation of sources is a standard academic expectation.

For this document "plagiarism" is briefly defined as any text, image, concept, idea or other information which has been incorporated either directly or indirectly from an original source, without proper citation of that source, into work which has been presented as the student's own.

For the purposes of this policy, plagiarism may be further defined as Type A or B. Type A plagiarism is the uncited usage of substantial amounts of material, such as submitting all or part of another person's work as one's own, either directly or with only minor modification. Underlying the definition of Type A plagiarism is that (a) the uncited material is clearly not the student's own; (b) it comprises a significant portion of the paper or other work which has been presented as the student's own; and (c) the manner in which it was included without attribution seemed unlikely to have been inadvertent.

Type B plagiarism would be the uncited or inadequately-cited use of specific expessions, concepts, viewpoints, assumptions, images, etc., from other sources within what otherwise appears to be original student work where the weight of the uncited material is relatively minor and the way in which it was incorporated may have resulted from oversight or ignorance rather than intention.

Neither type of plagiarism is acceptable, but they may be distinguished by the weight the plagiarized material holds in the work in question, the extent to which it had been taken directly from an original source, and such factors as whether the work in question was a preliminary rather than the final version of a paper, or whether an original source had not been cited at all, or was merely cited incompletely (for example, material from another source was not footnoted, although the source itself was noted in a Bibliography) so that the possibility of inadvertency exists.

Staff Procedure When Plagiarism is Suspected

Class B Plagiarism

  1. In cases of Type B plagiarism, particularly if it occurs in preliminary versions of student work, and may have resulted from oversight or ignorance of good academic practice, the normal procedure would be for the teacher to consult with the student, explain what the teacher considers to be inadequate with the citation of material which is apparently from other sources, refer the student to references on citation procedure, and request the student to correct the deficiencies before the work is graded. In such cases the consultation would be only between the teacher and student in question, with the expectation that the revised work would resolve any problem areas and a normal grade could then be awarded based on the quality of the revised work.

  2. If the problem areas were not resolved in the student's revised paper, or if Type B plagarism recurs in other work by the same student, the teacher should (a) make a reference copy of the problem area(s) in question; and (b) specifically consult with the student as to why the problem has recurred.

  3. If the teacher feels it warranted after this consultation, the issue may be referred to an English Section staff meeting for discussion and recommendation of further action. In this case the teacher must inform the student of his intention to refer the issue onwards, and the student must have the right to be present and represent himself if the issue is discussed.
Class A Plagiarism
  1. In cases of suspected Class A plagiarism, the teacher should first make a reference copy of the whole or relevant parts of the student work; and where the original source of plagiarized material can be determined, also make reference copies of the relevant parts of that work. Following this, the teacher should consult privately with the student to present the evidence of apparent plagiarism and offer the student a chance to explain. If there is a mitigating explanation, the matter may then be treated as Class B plagiarism.

  2. However, if it is clear after consultation that plagiarism has occurred in work which is significant to course evaluation, the result will be the automatic failure of the student in that course. The teacher will (a) inform the student of this failure; (b) inform the English Section staff and other Department teachers of this student of the incident; and (c) provide copies of the plagiarized work and evidence of the original source(s) to the Head of Department, after which the student will be required to consult with the Head of Department or other university authority concerning possible further action, including steps relevant to section 19 of University Statute 645/97 and section 20 of University Statute 115/98, respectively.

  3. Failure in a course resulting from plagiarism would not prevent the student from re-taking the course during the next full academic year.

  4. If an international student is found guilty of Type A plagiarism, the student's host section and/or department at Tampere University (if other than the English Section of the Translation Department) will be also notified. In addition to sections 1-2 above, a letter outlining the situation will be sent to the student's home university. The Tampere University International Student Office will also be notified, and may take further action of its own, including possible termination of the international student's stay at Tampere University.

Top  —  English Section Home  —  English Section Index  —  English Section Staff  —  Department of Translation Studies

Format Last Updated 27 January 2010