|
DIGITAL TELEVISION:
WHAT, WHY AND HOW?
by Pertti Näränen
http://www.tamk.fi/~narper/
The main perspectives to discuss
media or any given medium are technology, economy,
and culture, the latter including social and aesthetic
consideration. In what follows, I discuss digital
television from all these perspectives, but not clearly
separating different perspectives under different
subtitles because, in practise, the technological,
economical and cultural features of digital television
are intertwined and have a certain input to one another.
In this article I start with
technical and economic promises of digital television
(DTV), continue with a short history of DTV from the
European perspective, then move on to an overview
of competition situation and economic problems in
the early development. Finally, I'll focus more precisely
on the development in Finland. The acronyms and abbreviations
used are explained in a separate appendix.
Digital
promises
The term digital television does not principally refer
to digital audiovisual production technology or digital
television sets but rather to digital signal delivery
of audiovisual programmes and services in various
channels and platforms.
DTV promises different options and benefits to different
stakeholders. In the European media policy context,
the main motivation for using digital transmission
technology is the fact that digital coding and compression
use the frequency spectrum more efficiently than the
analogue signal modulation technology. This is especially
tempting for terrestrial broadcasting, because terrestrial
radio wave spectrum has long been a scarce resource.
Satellite transmission is not as bandwidth-constrained
than terrestrial or cable broadcasting but enhanced
picture quality and new commercial interactive services
like game channels and online shopping channels are
of more interest there.
More efficient use of the frequency spectrum provides
two different benefits. Firstly, increased channel
space can be used by broadcasters for new programmes,
interactive services or improvements in technical
quality of the picture and sound. Secondly, especially
after analogue switch-off, some UHF frequencies below
1 GHz, currently reserved for television broadcasting,
could be reallocated to be used for new mobile services
– UMTS and other 'third generation' wireless
services and digital television broadcasting (datacasting)
for hand held mobile receivers (Serafini, 2001; Grünwald,
2001; Aaltonen 2003).
The first promise, new channel space for broadcasters,
is already being fulfilled. The number of television
channels in Europe has doubled every three years between
1985 and 2000. Digital transmission is still increasing
the figures. There were 47 channels available in Europe
in 1989 and more than 1500 by 2002, over 600 of which
are digital. (Papathanassopoulos 2002, 31; BIPE Consulting
2002, 5.) However, while most of these new channels
are bundled into different satellite platforms and
pay-TV access, the choice offered to any given consumer
is not as high as the pure figures may imply. Improvements
in picture quality from digital transmissions are
still only minimal, since spectrum-hungry High Definition
television (HDTV) is not yet transmitted anywhere
in Europe. The development of interactive services
is slower than anticipated due to technical problems,
different standards and slow consumer demand, but
it still remains an essential part of European DTV
policy (European Commission, 2003).
It is worth noting that increase in the number of
channels also creates new problems. It increases the
costs of broadcasting when more companies compete
to acquire the most popular content as mainstream
cinema and sport broadcasting rights to their channels.
At the same time fragmentation of audiences decreases
the advertising incomes per channel – at least
in free-to-air programming. If each program has to
be produced cheaper than before, it is bound to lead
the European broadcasters to decrease their own quality
programme production and increase the import of cheapest
possible programmes.
Because American series have already creamed their
vast domestic market before they are resold to Europe,
they can be sold here much cheaper than the European
programs. Thus more television in Europe is likely
to mean more American content (Corcoran 1999, 84;
Doyle 2002, 87-89; Papathanassopoulos 2002, 15-25).
European trade deficit in TV rights with the USA is
increasing: it was about 4.1 billion € in 2000
which was 17.5% more than a year before (European
Commission 2002, 5). This economic dependency on US
television content has its cultural implications too.
Fulfilment of the second promise, new frequencies
for mobile industry, is questionable. The need of
mobile industry for new frequencies is not as great
as previously anticipated. At its May 2000 conference
in Istanbul, the International Telecommunication Union
reserved new frequencies for European third generation
mobile networks in the 2520-2670 MHz band, which is
technically more suitable for UMTS than the television
frequencies of today. This new space will satisfy
the spectrum needs of mobile operators for some years.
It is also now evident that the UMTS spectrum requirements
calculated in the late 1990s were grossly overestimated
(BIPE Consulting 2002, 89). Thus we may say, that
the overheated market expectations for the mobile
industry increased the rush to introduce DTV.
All in all, DTV represents an opportunity to encourage
competition and growth both in the broadcasting and
mobile industry. In the European Union media policy
this pro-competitive industrial orientation has long
prevailed over cultural policy (Näränen
2003; cf. Liikanen 2003).
Terrestrial, cable and
satellite – or broadband television
The main forms of television delivery have been terrestrial,
satellite and cable television. The most traditional
form is terrestrial free-to-air (FTA) broadcasting
which can be received with regular rooftop antenna.
Also terrestrial microwave distribution has been used
e.g. in Ireland, Switzerland and in the USA is some
remote communities, but it will remain marginal.
Cable delivery was originally developed to be used
in communities where geographical formations make
the terrestrial radio signal weak or vulnerable to
changing weather conditions. Signal received with
a communal antenna was delivered further by a local
cable company.
In the early 70's the cable television started to
develop into new directions when Home Box Office (HBO)
company launched its cinema and sport channels in
major US cities using first terrestrial microwave
towers and then satellites to deliver programmes to
redistribution via local cable networks. The paying
customers received new mainstream films and other
premium content against a monthly payment. This started
the era of pay-TV. Ever since the major cable television
corporations have lived in symbiosis with international
satellite channels: satellite channels can be reached
with private direct-to-home (DTH) satellite dishes
but most viewers access them with local cable delivery.
On the other hand, there is a connection between cable
and terrestrial television too, because public authorities
have laid down so called 'must carry rules' to ensure
that cable television companies deliver also the channels
of terrestrial public service broadcasters (PSBs).
In some countries, as in the UK, also the satellite
operators deliver PSB channels while e.g. in Finland
that is not the case.
1980's the pay-TV satellite channels invaded the Europe
too. This was made possible not only by new technology
but also by a new political trend called 'deregulation',
which introduced neo-liberal media policy and ended
the era of public service monopoly television in most
western European states, as well as in New Zealand
and Australia. This radically changed the structures
of television economy and supported the globalisation
of television culture (Collins 1994; Wieten et al
2000; Näränen 2003). There are many who
see the advent of DTV representing the second wave
of deregulation (see e.g. Papathanassopoulos 2002,
31).
The development of the European standards for digital
television transmission started in September 1993
in a Digital Video Broadcasting Group, initiated by
German public broadcasters and leading European television
manufacturers. The group started with the notion that
the European union led project to develop analogue
wide screen HDTV will never bear the fruit and that
the fast development in digital technology must be
regarded as a new starting point (Bulkey 2003).
DVB group soon succeeded to create the European DTV
standard called Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB),
first to the satellite platform (DVB-S) and by 1995
to terrestrial (DVB-T) and cable (DVB-C) broadcasting
too. The USA and Japan created their own standards
(ATSC and ISDB) approximately at the same time.
In addition to the traditional platforms, the television
programmes have been delivered digitally in the Internet
or in separate local networks. The Internet-telly
can also be seen as a form of digital television,
even if it still is not economically and technically
feasible outside limited high speed networks in densely
populated areas. Video datacasting to hand held devices
(advanced mobile phones, PDA's) is also already in
use in limited test areas but the economic models
of the business are not ready yet. The future, with
new digital signal compression standards and broadband
home connections like ADSL, may develop the Internet-TV
or mobile-TV as an option for global mass audiences
too, but most probably not without new extensive fees
for the consumers.
Satellite
dominating – with multiple set-top box standards
Satellite has dominated the early DTV development
all around the world, because of the wealthy companies,
deregulated environment, and the fact that the satellite
viewers have always been familiar with the set-top
boxes and pay-TV.
Europe's first digital satellite (Astra 1E) was successfully
placed into orbit in October 1995 by a commercial
company controlled from Luxembourg. The pioneers in
digital broadcasting were DStv (Telepiú) in
Italy, Canal Satellite Numérique (Canal+) in
France, and DF1 (Kirch Group) in Germany, soon followed
by three other French players. Already by the end
of 2001 the major European pay-TV satellite services
were transmitting in digital format only. In late
2002 almost 20 % of the western European households
already received digital television and over 70 %
of them were connected to digital satellite.
Even if the pace of the development has been rapid
in digital satellite broadcasting, there have been
many problems along the way too. The major satellite
operators wanted to create their own "middleware
standards" (API and CA systems) needed for interactive
services and pay-TV customer identification. Private
standards embody the constant need for media oligopolies
to control their audiences.
In practise this meant that even if broadcasters used
same European digital transmission standard across
Europe, audience access to those signals would be
strictly limited to households equipped with the ‘right’
kind of set-top box receiver. Due to lack of common
standard, STBs are not interoperable and interactive
services must be tailored to suit different box models,
which is expensive. (Papathanassopoulos 2002, 40-53;
Näränen 2003.) No wonder the early DTV development
has been marked by consumer confusion and a slow development
of useful interactive applications.
Only the strongest media conglomerates seem to survive
in the digital pay-TV business. Many pioneer companies
in digital broadcasting have fled the arena in economic
difficulties or bankruptcy. Approximately 150 European
TV channels now operate at a loss (Forrester 2003).
Rupert Murdoch's Sky Digital (BSkyS) in the UK is
probably the single digital satellite operator in
Europe making good profits – based on the way
in which it has been able to monopolise its domestic
pay-TV markets (Collins 2002).
Terrestrial
broadcasting: case Finland
Terrestrial digital broadcasting started in the USA
and UK November 1998, in Sweden April 1999, in Spain
May 2000 and in Australia January 2001. Finland was
sixth in a row in August 2001.
The UK is the only European state where terrestrial
DTV is already well developed with approximately 2
million households, compared to 7 million digital
satellite viewers. In many other European countries
the development of digital terrestrial television
is still in its infancy, but it is included in long
term plans everywhere.
Finnish analogue television media consists of the
public service channels TV1 and TV2 and the commercial
channels MTV3 (acronym meaning 'Advertising television',
not Music Television) and Nelonen (Channel Four).
MTV3 is a corporation of Alma Media, which is partly
owned by the major Swedish publishing house Bonnier.
The fourth channel is owned by SanomaWSOY, the largest
commercial media company in the Nordic countries.
Nelonen has been operating at a loss since it started
in 1997, but is getting more and more viewers. Almost
half of the households in Finland have access to cable
television and 11 per cent subscribe satellite services,
but the use of pay-TV channels has remained exceptionally
low maybe partly because of the language barrier.
The development of DTV started with governmental decisions
in 1996. The government saw the digitisation of television
as an important element in its 'information society'
strategy and as a way to protect Finnish culture and
domestic programme production from the invasion of
foreign owned satellite broadcasters. Of the altogether
13 digital licences awarded in 1999 only two went
to applicants other than the incumbent broadcasters,
the rest were shared by Finnish Broadcasting Corporation
YLE, Alma Media and Sanoma group (Brown 2003). Four
channels were supposed to operate on pay-TV basis.
Finland was the first country in the world starting
digital broadcasting using pan-European MHP standard
for interactive applications instead of proprietary
standards of satellite corporations. MHP is a good
solution for the future because it is the only open,
common standard capable for multiple advanced interactive
services. MHP is now widely supported by the EU as
a common standard but it has taken too long, however,
for the Commission to formulate specific proposals
to support the implementation of MHP in second generation
STBs (European Commission 2003). Hardware manufacturers
didn't move fast enough to provide MHP boxes to the
small Finnish markets also because MHP requires more
processor efficiency and Flash/RAM memory from the
STB hardware than was hitherto needed (Flynn, 2001).
Due to all this, by the time Finland started digital
broadcasting, August 27th 2001, there were actually
no digital receivers available on the market. The
first boxes entered the stores in October and the
MHP-boxes only a year later. This fact was lampooned
in the press, leading to a damaged credibility of
DTV in the eyes of the viewers.
Also the development of the content proved to be more
difficult than anticipated. In 2002 it became clear
that all the pay-TV channels refuse to start broadcasting,
due to lacking pay-TV infrastructure and user interest.
Two channels (youth channel SubTV and the Sports channel)
transferred their operations also to the analogue
cable delivery. The remaining three 'digital-only'
channels were public service channels YLE 24, a news
and current affairs service, YLE Teema, a channel
for culture, education and science and FST-D, a full
service channel for the Swedish-speaking minority
(6 % of the Finnish population). In their first year
YLE channels were mostly recycling their analogue
content in the digital platform, but at least YLE
was the only company who succeeded to keep its promises
for the viewer.
However, the interest in digital
television has been on rise since the late 2002, when
the MHP boxes finally entered the market. There are
now (Oct 2003) almost 130 000 cable and terrestial
boxes, which means that appr. 6 % of the 2,2 million
Finnish households can access national digital television.
The amount of digital satellite boxes is estimated
to 57 000. In 2004 new terrestrial channels are bound
to enter the field (Canal+ pay-TV channel and a group
of local city channels). YLE is just about to launch
its new interactive digital teletext services and
in MTV3 teletext pages new interactive commercial
electronic services like banking, online shopping
and interactive advertising are ready for launch.
The
Future?
All things considered, the promise that DTV has best
fulfilled so far has been the increase in the number
of channels, first on satellite and then on cable
and terrestrial platform. The quality of television
has not improved similarly and the development of
new services has been slow. The European Union has
not succeeded well in protecting the consumer interest
in the development, as the problems with common standard
implementation illustrate. However, the concerns related
to digital broadcasting – trade deficit, concentration
of media ownership, poor economics and lack of interoperability
– have increased since the late 1990's. The
EU media policy now has seriously paid attention to
these dilemmas too (European Commission 2003). This
has summed up to at least slightly new European media
policy approach in which 'pro-regulation' has in the
turn of the century re-captured some ground from deregulation.
For the television viewers DTV promises greater variety
of choice, but also new costs. Old television set
is no more enough. New STB models will have more advanced
features included, as card slots for pay-TV customer
identification and online banking, a hard disk for
programme recording and play back functions, Internet
browser and broadband return channel instead of regular
phone modem. Broadcasting to hand held devises may
become possible. Most new services are not free anyhow.
New features in the receiving technology are also
problematic for the broadcasters. With multiple kind
of receivers it will be more and more difficult to
build services that can be used in all the platforms
and with all the receivers. Especially the traditional
public service principle of "universal service"
is challenged by technology.
There are no reasons to see digital television as
a radically new networked media system. Even with
a set top box and a return channel option DTV will
for long remain just a television – an audiovisual
mass medium, not very different from today. It will
have some enhanced features and possibilities for
alternative and secondary use, just like game consoles
widened up the possibilities of television use in
the past, but the ways in which television programmes
are produced and viewed change relatively slowly.
Digital broadcasting is of little interest for those
viewers, who are satisfied with the programmes and
picture quality of analogue television and who have
little money to invest in new receivers and new services.
Is DTV only a rich man's television for the overdeveloped
world? A serious ethical question is, how to justify
this kind of abundance of media channels, services,
applications and gadgets in a world where the majority
of people are still lacking paper, pen and basic education.
More information in
the Internet:
Finnish digital television forum www.digitv.fi/
European Digital Video Broadcasting Group www.dvb.org/
DVB-MHP Site www.mhp.org/
Digital Terrestrial Television Action Group www.digitag.org/
The Digital Television Group UK www.dtg.org.uk/
European Broadcasting Union www.ebu.ch
Federal Communications Commission (USA) www.fcc.gov/dtv
European Audiovisual Observatory www.obs.coe.int/
Freeview www.freeview.co.uk/
Broadbandbananas, ITV applications from the UK www.broadbandbananas.com/
References
Aaltonen, Janne (2003). Content Distribution Using
Wireless Broadcast and Multicast Communication Networks.
Tampere University of Technology Publications 430
(dissertation).
BIBE Consulting (2002). Digital Switchover in Broadcasting:
A BIPE Consulting Study for the European Commission.
Final Report, April 12, 2002. http://europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/telecoms/regulatory/studies/
documents/digital_switchover_in_broadcasting_executive_summary_120402_en.pdf
(accessed 20.3.2003)
Brown, Allan (2003). Technology-driven Industry Restructure:
The Case of Terrestial Television Broadcasting in
Finland. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.
Series B: Research Reports, B1/2003.
Bulkey, Kate (2003). "The DVB's Professor Ulrich
Reimers talks to Kate Bulkey". The Digital news
(Magazine of the Digital Television Group UK), nro
32, August. 2003.
Collins, Richard (1994). Broadcasting and Audio-Visual
Policy in the European Single Market. London: John
Libbey.
Collins, Richard (2002). "2002 – Digital
Television in the United Kingdom". Javnost -
The Public , vol. 9, nro 4, 2002, pp. 5-18.
Corcoran, Farrel (1999). "Towards Digital Television
in Europe: A Race Or A Crawl?" Javnost - the
public 6 (1999):3, p. 67-86.
Doyle, Gillian (2002). Understanding Media Economics,
London, Sage.
European Commission (2002). COM(2002) 778 final, Fourth
report from the
Commission on the application of directive 89/552/EEC
‘Television Without Frontiers’, Brussels.
European Commission (2003). Commission staff working
document on barriers to widespread access to new services
and applications of the Information Society through
open platforms in digital television and third generation
mobile communications, February, europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/telecoms/regulatory/
publiconsult/documents/211_29_en.pdf (accessed 17.03.03).
Flynn, Barry (2001). "STB Makers Concede MHP
Premium". INSIDE Digitaltv (Published by PBI
Media) Nov 19, 2001, p. 3.
Forrester, Chris (2003). "UK Digital: the state
of play". The Digital news
(Magazine of the Digital Television Group UK), nro
32, August. 2003.
Grünwald, Andreas (2001). "Riding the US
wave: spectrum auctions in the digital age".
Telecommunications Policy, vol. 25, no. 10/11, 719-28.
Liikanen, Erkki (2003). "Is digital TV a priority
for Europe?", European Parliament, February,
speech/03/72, europa.eu.int/comm/commissioners/liikanen/media/
speeches/text_en.htm (accessed 20.03.03).
Näränen, Pertti (2003). "The Opportunity
Lost and Found? European Regulation
of Digital Television." In Greg Lowe and Taisto
Hujanen (eds.), Broadcasting & Convergence: New
Articulations of the Public Service Remit, Nordicom:
Gothenburg, 2003, pp. 57-68 . (See www.nordicom.gu.se
/ Books in English.)
MOTC (2003). Suomalainen tv-tarjonta 2002 (Finnish
television output 2002, Minna Aslama and Jaana Wallenius).
Ministry of Transport and Communication, publication
40/2003. http://www.mintc.fi/www/sivut/dokumentit/julkaisu/
julkaisusarja/2003/a402003.pdf (accessed 20.9.2003)
Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos (2002). European television
in the digital age: issues, dynamics and realities.
St. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell
Publishers.
Serafini, Dom (2001). "For how long will broadcast
be an over-the-air TV biz?", InterMedia, vol.
28, no. 4.
Wieten, Jan, Murdock, Graham & Dahlgren, Peter
(eds.) (2000). Television Across Europe. A Comparative
Introduction. London: Sage.
APPENDIX:
The Acronyms and abbreviations used or relevant for
the subject
ADSL - Asymmetric
Digital Subscriber Line, a new technology that allows
more data to
be sent over existing copper telephone lines.
API - Application
Program Interface; In a set-top box (STB) API is a
software which helps the programmers to write applications
consistent with the operating environment. Together
with CAS and EPG, API form the "middleware solutions"
of interactive services. Only common API ensures interoperability
of digital receivers so that one STB can receive programs
and services from more than one platform.
ATSC - Advanced
Television Systems Committee. Established the American
standards
for digital television. Standard is using 8-VSB signal
modulation, including digital high definition television
(HDTV) but using the bandwidth less efficiently than
the European DVB standard. See www.atsc.org
Broadband - Traditionally
a network connection capable for delivering one digital
video signal comparable to analogue VHS video quality.
In prevailing MPEG-2 compression technology that means
a connection with 2 Mbit/s undisturbed bandwidth,
even if Internet Service Providers are sometimes inaccurately
calling broadband even 256 kbit/s speeds.
CA - Conditional
Access (System). A software which makes it possible
for the pay-tv broadcaster to identify the paying
customers.
COFDM - Coded Orthogonal
Frequency Division Multiplexing; digital signal modultation
capable to transmit many streams of digital data simultaneously,
each occupying only a small portion of the total bandwidth.
Digital teletext
- Enhanced digital version of the analogue text television
service, including high definition pictures, multimedia
and animation and clickable links. Used
for information services or advertising.
DTH - Direct To
Home satellite television system, where household
has a private satellite dish.
DTT - Digital Terrestrial
Television which can be received with a basic rooftop
antenna.
DTV - Digital television.
Standard definition video quality uses 6 Mbit/s bandwidth
in MPEG-2 coding.
DVB - Digital Video
Broadcasting; European standard for digital television
and adopted by e.g. Australia, New Zealand and India
too. Different spesifications in terrestial (DVB-T),
satellite (DVB-S) or cable (DVB-C) broadcasting. See
www.dbv.org
DVR - Digital Video
Recorder, see PVR.
EPG - Electronic
Programme Guide. A channel selection and navigation
software for digital television; used to find, select
and record programs and services. EPG-functions can
be connected to other interactive applications too,
like additional information services, advertising
or teleshopping.
FTA - Free to air
television, terrestial television with no fees for
the viewers except possibly an annual licence fee.
HDTV - High Definition
TV. In digital TV using appr. 20 Mbit/s bandwidth
with MPEG-2 coding.
idTV - integrated
DTV where the STB and the monitor are attached
IRD - Integrated
Receiver Decoder, see Set Top Box
ISDB - Integrated
Service Digital Broadcasting. A Japanese DTV standard.
kbit/s - Kilobytes
per second; an amount of thousand bytes (composed
of 8 binary bits each) that a digital delivery line
can transfer in one second.
MHP - Multimedia
Home Platform. An DTV API standard for interactive
services. See www.mhp.org
MPEG - Moving Pictures
Expert Group; MPEG-2 is the prevailing standard for
signal compression in digital broadcasting both in
ATSC and DVB standards
PDA - Personal Digital
Assistant, a handheld device that combines computing,
phone/fax, Internet and networking features.
PSB - Public service
broadcaster
PVR - Personal Video
Recorder, same as Digital Video Recorder; a separate
device for digital hard disk recording and storage
of television programmes.
RAM - Random Access
Memory. The place in a computer where the operating
system, application programs, and data in current
use are kept so that they can be quickly reached by
the computer's processor.
STB - Set Top Box;
receives the digital broadcasting signal and translates
it understandable for analogue TV set; basically a
computer which includes microprocessor, RAM memory,
operating system, Conditional Access System (CAS),
memory card reader and sometimes even a modem and
a hard drive recorder (PVR). Also know as IRD.
UMTS - Universal
Mobile Telecommunications Services. New mobile phone
system using radio waves over 2 GHz frequency band
to support fast data and multimedia services. See
www.umts-forum.org/
|